Radiology IT ownership in the crosshairs

Radiology IT ownership in the crosshairs, now this is one touchy topic.  I touch on this subject at my last 3 talks and while the message was on Enterprise imaging informatics and trends of PACS (which naturally reflects the real world events and trends) where PACS is moving out of radiology and into the hospital enterprise. You cannot imagine that some radiographers actually took offence to that message (even though I also advocate that neither IT nor Radiology /Cardiology/ etc owns PACS – it is a joint ownership) and if I am not mistaken, they are not PACS Administrators (or related support staff).

The original article rationales that given the products of radiology (diagnostic imaging data and reports) are being more widely distributed across the healthcare enterprise, it has arouse debates  within the medical community over which group is best able to administer and maintain radiology IT systems: the radiology department or a centralized IT group. I’ll say that the mix will get more complicated once they get other imaging disciplines like Cardiology, Endoscopy etc etc.

“Today, more compelling reasons support the treatment of PACS as a component of an enterprise strategy that appropriately falls under the chief information officer (CIO) and the IT organization,” wrote George H. Bowers, a principal at the Baltimore-based Health Care Information Consultants, in a point/counterpoint discussion of radiology IT ownership published online before print (April 23) in the Journal of Digital Imaging.

David S. Channin, MD, from the department of radiology at the Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University in Chicago wrote the counterpoint, holding that “radiology is too large, too complex, too valuable, and too dependant on IT to be treated as an ordinary IT customer.”

According to Bowers, the CIO should manage PACS due to the technical complexity of today’s IT environment, which has been steadily migrating from an application-centric approach to an enterprise-wide approach in response to regulatory and economic requirements.

“As PACS technology becomes more pervasive in the organization, it must be centrally managed to avoid duplication of costs and maintain consistency of service,” he noted.

“Channin observed that all radiology processes depend on IT.” 

“The information systems in imaging are not generic systems; they require specialty knowledge and maintenance skills,” he wrote. “Central IT often operates in system silos. Radiology IT staff must be cross-trained in their systems. It is a fulltime job that does not end when the ‘go-live’ date passes. The systems must be constantly monitored for correct use, upgrades, and optimization.”

Bowers conceded that the priorities of the radiology department and centralized IT will probably never be the same.

“But radiology is only one component in delivering care to the patient,” he wrote. “Coordinating the care of a patient among all of the diagnostic and treatment options in the most efficient and cost-effective manner must be the priority of our healthcare delivery system. Processes that affect patient care may flow between and among many departments. IT has been charged with delivering the EMR, which focuses on the patient—not the hospital department. The patient must be the priority, even if this means compromises elsewhere in the delivery system. What is best for the patient may not necessarily be the best or most efficient for individual departments.”

Channin acknowledged the healthcare enterprise is the key user of a PACS. However, his belief is that information professionals located in the radiology department are the most qualified to administer and deliver data to those users.

“I contend that radiology understands the requirements and needs better than a centralized IT organization,” he wrote. “Enterprise healthcare providers are our customers.”

Citing the leadership role radiology has played in the evolution of the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE)—an initiative by healthcare professionals and industry to improve the way computer systems in healthcare share information—Channin argued that radiology “can and does serve as a technology exemplar” for other medical specialties.

“The CIO must lead in the support of standards, interoperability, compliance with policies, procedures, and regulations,” he wrote. “He or she should supply intellectual and financial nourishment to let a garden of innovation grow.”

About Adam Chee

Health Informatician
This entry was posted in Blog - Health IT, Blog - Medical & Healthcare. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s