Older imaging studies necessary for clinical routine

The folks at EMC and Hitachi will love this one, the age long debate on the ‘lifespan’ of a radiological image have been ‘resolved’.

One of the main reason for PACS implementation is the ability to ‘instantly” access prior images and hospitals administrator are forever wondering how long these images should be kept.

Some guidelines recommended 7 years for adults and 21 years of paediatrics, others suggest that medical images should be stored forever, the decision towards the retention period affects a couple of decisions, among these are

  • The upfront and operational cost of adding storage (also , data on spinning disk not being used = waste of aircon and electricity)
  • The scalability of the storage architecture designed / proposed (which can translate to higher upfront cost for high end equipment)
  • How much data to migrate when choosing / replacing a PACS.

The results of a study presented at the recent RSNA (read more here) reveals the breakdown for images access for clinical routine;

  • 48 percent – studies between one and two years of age
  • 22 percent – studies between two and three years old
  • 13 percent – studies between three and four years old
  • 9 percent – studies between four and five years old
  • 6 percent – studies between five and six years old
  • 2 percent – studies between six and seven years old

Hope this piece of information can help you ‘size up’ your PACS 🙂

About Adam Chee

Health Informatician
This entry was posted in Blog - Health IT. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s